Scaling With Platform Engineering.md
Listen it as a podcast
Scaling Modern Software Delivery with Platform Engineering: Lessons from the Field
Introduction: Why Platform Engineering Matters to Me
As someone who has spent a good part of my career building and integrating systems in fast-paced environments, I've seen firsthand how traditional development setups can slow teams down. Long release cycles, coordination chaos, and mounting operational complexity—sound familiar? That’s where platform engineering steps in.
Platform engineering isn’t just about tools or infrastructure. It’s about building internal developer platforms (IDPs) that help dev teams ship faster, with less friction and more autonomy. These platforms provide self-service APIs, reusable tools, documentation, and support—basically, everything a dev team needs to move without bottlenecks.
In this post, I want to walk through how platform engineering can transform software delivery in growing teams, drawing from real-world patterns, topologies, and my own lessons along the way.
1. From Horizontal Layers to Vertical Teams
Back in the day, teams were split horizontally—frontend, backend, database. This structure helped with governance but limited product ownership. Today, the move is toward vertical teams that own everything from UI to deployment for a specific domain (like payments or search).
This shift, powered by microservices, enables autonomy. But here’s the catch:
- Teams end up with more responsibilities—infra, security, monitoring, CI/CD—you name it.
- More autonomy often increases cognitive load, not decreases it.
Lesson: Verticalization is powerful, but without proper platform support, it becomes overwhelming.
2. Reducing Cognitive Load with Platform Teams
When I was working on integration-heavy backends, I felt the pressure of juggling too many systems at once. That’s where platform teams make a difference.
Modern orgs rely on three team types to manage complexity:
- Enabling Teams: Help product teams adopt tools and best practices.
- Complex Subsystem Teams: Handle deep systems like fraud or search ranking.
- Platform Teams: Build the shared platform that abstracts away infrastructure complexity.
The goal? Give devs a product-like internal platform they can use to self-serve infra, run tests, deploy code, or monitor performance—without filing tickets or pinging ops.
3. Monolith vs. Distributed Platform Models
I’ve seen both extremes—massive monolithic platforms managed by one team and fully distributed platform ownership. Neither is perfect.
- Monolithic platforms: Easier to start but become bottlenecks and fragile over time.
- Distributed platforms: More resilient and scalable but harder to coordinate.
Many teams end up deploying multiple Kubernetes clusters to reduce blast radius but then struggle with governance and observability.
Takeaway: Start simple. As you scale, balance autonomy with consistency across platform domains.
4. Developer API: Shifting Ownership to Teams
One of the most exciting shifts I’ve seen is the move from ops-heavy infrastructure to self-service via developer APIs.
Imagine your app team needs a Kafka topic. Instead of waiting for infra folks, they define their need in Git, and the platform takes care of provisioning.
That’s what Infrastructure as Code (IaC) and platform APIs enable. It’s a win-win:
- Platform teams focus on improving the product, not handling one-off requests.
- Application teams move faster without sacrificing governance.
This shift is key to scaling without burning out ops.
5. Scaling Considerations from Experience
As orgs grow, team structures and responsibilities must evolve. I’ve seen this play out in various ways:
- Stream-aligned product teams drive business value.
- Platform teams reduce friction across the board.
- Enabling teams help bridge capability gaps.
The tech stack evolves too—Kubernetes, ArgoCD, Kafka, Terraform, GitOps—all become part of the platform puzzle.
Start with container orchestration, then layer in observability, messaging, and data services. Build APIs that allow teams to consume what they need with minimal guidance.
Conclusion: Platform Engineering as a Strategic Lever
Here’s the bottom line: Platform engineering is a product, not a service. It empowers teams, reduces delays, and keeps everyone aligned as complexity grows.
Key takeaways for your journey:
- Avoid central bottlenecks—enable teams to self-serve.
- Offer developer APIs and solid documentation.
- Use platform thinking to reduce delivery lead times and increase team happiness.
- Don’t over-engineer early—evolve as you grow.
Platform engineering has changed how I think about scaling teams. It's not just infrastructure—it's a mindset.
If you're building or scaling an internal platform and want to exchange ideas, feel free to connect!